Rule

What must a federally regulated lender disclose about a mortgage penalty?

Short answer

Federally regulated institutions must explain how the prepayment charge is calculated, including the process or formula and the information needed to estimate it.

The client concern

A homeowner receives a five-figure penalty quote but cannot reproduce the calculation or understand which comparison rate was used.

What the official guidance says

FCAC guidance requires disclosure of the method used to calculate a mortgage prepayment charge and access to information that helps consumers estimate it.

What it does not guarantee

Disclosure does not make every penalty identical or negotiable. The actual contract may use three months’ interest, an interest-rate differential or another permitted method. Penalties at other lender types depend on their contracts and applicable rules.

A practical Ontario example

Illustration only: A fixed mortgage states the charge is the greater of three months’ interest and IRD. The lender should explain the comparison rate and formula, but the client still needs a current payout quote because the amount can change daily.

What to do next

Request the written calculation, payout date, per-diem interest and all discharge fees. Test whether using available privileges, porting, waiting or blending changes the cost. Never refinance based on a rough online estimate alone.

Questions worth asking

  • Does this federal protection apply to my type of lender and mortgage?
  • Which relief, fee, penalty or payment terms are confirmed in writing?
  • How will the decision change my balance, amortization and total interest?
  • Will my credit, future renewal or ability to switch be affected?
  • What is the lower-risk fallback if the lender declines the request?

Rajiv’s broker perspective

The first goal is to protect the client’s home, credit and decision-making time. I would begin with the existing lender because it may offer the lowest-cost correction. If that is not enough, we can compare an A refinance, alternative/B solution, MIC or private bridge based on equity, timing, total cost and a realistic exit. A regulator’s expectation should never be described as a guaranteed lender approval.

Need help preparing the lender conversation? Request a mortgage strategy second opinion with Rajiv.

Sources and context

Read the primary source

Source checked
2026-09-07
Next review
2026-12-07
Assumptions and limitations
Applicability depends on lender type, mortgage contract, consumer circumstances and current official guidance.

Source checks are snapshots, not a guarantee that rules have remained unchanged. Individual circumstances and lender policies vary.

Continue learning

Have a question? See contact options

Need help with your mortgage situation?Get My Mortgage Second OpinionCall 647.291.7116